Controlled Trial of Live Versus Recorded Lullabies in Preterm Infants

Contact Us Forums Low Frequency Sound Research Published Articles / books/ Abstracts/ web links Controlled Trial of Live Versus Recorded Lullabies in Preterm Infants

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #79444
      victoriar
      Participant

      Garunkstiene, R., Buinauskiene, J., Uloziene, I., & Markuniene, E. (2014). Controlled trial of live versus recorded lullabies in preterm infants. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 23 (1), 71-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2013.809783
      Link: http://journals1.scholarsportal.info/pdf/08098131/v23i0001/71_ctolvrlipi.xml

      Abstract:

      The aim of this study was to compare the effects of live and recorded lullabies on physiological and behavioral state outcomes of stable preterm infants. We conducted a prospective, repeated measures crossover study, involving 35 stable infants of less than 32 weeks postmenstrual age. Each infant received a different intervention for three consecutive days (live lullabies, recorded lullabies, and no-music sessions). The infant was observed every 5 minutes for 30 minutes before, 20 minutes during, and 30 minutes after the intervention. The results revealed that the infants’ heart rate (HR) decreased significantly for the live and recorded lullabies conditions but not for the control condition (p= .02). The findings also suggest that the live lullabies condition resulted in a deeper sleep than the recorded lullabies conditions but not for the control condition (p= .02) and the control condition (p=.006). No changes were observed in oxygen saturation level. The results of this study show that lullabies effectively reduce the HR of preterm infants less than 32 weeks postmenstrual age, and live lullabies have a greater beneficial impact on their sleep state than recorded lullabies.

Viewing 0 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.