Contact Us › Forums › Low Frequency Sound Research › Published Articles / books/ Abstracts/ web links › Controlled Trial of Live Versus Recorded Lullabies in Preterm Infants
Tagged: live, lullabies, Music Therapy, preterm infant, recorded
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 12 years ago by
victoriar.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 21, 2014 at 11:53 am #79444
victoriarParticipantGarunkstiene, R., Buinauskiene, J., Uloziene, I., & Markuniene, E. (2014). Controlled trial of live versus recorded lullabies in preterm infants. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy, 23 (1), 71-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2013.809783
Link: http://journals1.scholarsportal.info/pdf/08098131/v23i0001/71_ctolvrlipi.xmlAbstract:
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of live and recorded lullabies on physiological and behavioral state outcomes of stable preterm infants. We conducted a prospective, repeated measures crossover study, involving 35 stable infants of less than 32 weeks postmenstrual age. Each infant received a different intervention for three consecutive days (live lullabies, recorded lullabies, and no-music sessions). The infant was observed every 5 minutes for 30 minutes before, 20 minutes during, and 30 minutes after the intervention. The results revealed that the infants’ heart rate (HR) decreased significantly for the live and recorded lullabies conditions but not for the control condition (p= .02). The findings also suggest that the live lullabies condition resulted in a deeper sleep than the recorded lullabies conditions but not for the control condition (p= .02) and the control condition (p=.006). No changes were observed in oxygen saturation level. The results of this study show that lullabies effectively reduce the HR of preterm infants less than 32 weeks postmenstrual age, and live lullabies have a greater beneficial impact on their sleep state than recorded lullabies.
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.